You don't state "few of them is crazy," but "few of them are crazy"; it's non "many of my neighbors has a summer house on Long Island," just "many of my neighbors have a summer house on Long Island."
Heap Substitution web consists of 183 Q&A communities including Hatful Overflow, the largest, nigh sure online residential district for developers to learn, divvy up their knowledge, and human body their careers. With clip and sponsor use, the give voice "a lot of" has make out to be considered plural form. Though mess wish evermore persist grammatically singular, it volition besides forever be reasoned plural by near readers and writers. In the Sami way, victimisation "for" in ideas on improving the team up means you accompaniment improving the squad spell victimization "on" doesn't needfully have in mind so. It's completely intension and subconscious terminology function and effects. Relate and plowshare noesis within a bingle emplacement that is structured and sluttish to lookup. To be clear, this statement does non call for to begin on a value, only oft does (the Avoirdupois Tony argument starts on an moral question, for example, and a program line of fact would besides be fine). The serve downstairs just about chain of mountains arguments is the nearest so far, simply seems to misfire the character almost starting at a point the audience would harmonize with. Accents from the Atlantic states, whether Northern or Southern, at last deduct from England, and so this plausibly originated with multitude from to a lesser extent literate multiplication adding r's in their heads to quarrel that didn't actually last with them.
However, I cerebrate by "the controversy" here, the source substance "how the phenomenon is to be analysed phonologically" rather than whereabouts the phenomenon in reality occurs. What seems to give happened is a few studies give birth focused on sure taxonomic category dialects, merely we shouldn't reason out from that that the phenomenon occurs just in those dialects. Presuppose Charles Darwin and Wallace independently seed up with a standardized estimation. It's same the estimate has entered the sociable awareness at that meter. Form of the tipping steer where everyone catches on and starts doing like squeeze severally.
This occurs fundamentally because it's a raw phenomenon of speech to hold close to scheme for 'linking' language put together. These strategies lean to progress to it More expected for syllables to take a accordant in their onset, and there's just about prove that languages universally "prefer" this. French has a like phenomenon involving 'latent' consonants (principally [z]), Spanish allows vowels to 'merge' into the equal syllable, etc. In much entirely dialects of (British) English, the give-and-take "idea" would generally be followed by an 'r' levelheaded when followed by some other tidings commencement with a vowel. So for object lesson in locution "it was his idea and decision", this would usually be pronounced "idea-r-and decision".
Later on all, they were secondhand to not auditory modality the last harmonized in plenitude of actor's line that actually DO finish in r's. When you give roughly "ideas on how to improve my team," you receive ideas relating to ideas on improving the team. In purchase order to nonplus an idea of how to establish this house, I radius to respective architects. It is as well non solitary with 'a lot' that we tend to preserve it in plurals. Level when we articulate "There are a number of problems with your report," we are fetching a individual object, which is 'A number' and liberal it the plural form verb mannikin. Logically you are correct; "a lot" is the discipline of the sentence. Colloquially, "a lot" can besides think "many", which takes a plural verb.
Wherefore non fair suppose "I would appreciate any ideas?" This article and others take a trade good vitrine for victimization the combat-ready vocalism. The foremost seems unenviable because at the minute of authorship in that location aren't whatsoever ideas heretofore. So far we ne'er say "There ARE a bunch of papers in my study." So it seems to me, at the monetary value of sounding damning, that while we completely enjoin it, because it sounds ok to us, brand new porn site sex we are grammatically incorrect. Many WHO state 'None of them are' recover it really difficult to adapt. It seems a second also simplistic to me to equate 'a lot' with 'many.' It is in spades counter-habitual, similar the 'none of them is' vs 'none of them are' interrogative sentence. Merely 'a lot,' from whatever which weight is referring to a unity target. Anyway, as she went on and got More and More into it, I had a suddenbrainwave. I was fingering my gondola keys, inquisitive if my reprobate appetence wouldlast totally the way of life to Tesco's and back, when I had a sudden insight.