If you inquire of one IGNOU M.Com student what worries them the most in their final year the answer will be not just the exam papers. It's the actual project. It's not because the project is impossible, but because nobody can explain it a simple, practical way. It's formal in nature, the language at university is a bit distant and senior students often say, "Bas format follow karo." This suggestion isn't complete.
![national_digital_library [lglibtech]](https://lglibtech.com/_media/wiki:logo.png)
An M.Com course at IGNOU does not require sophisticated research skills. It's about showing you have a thorough understanding of your subject enough so that you can research an issue, analyse it sensibly and present your findings in a structured manner. When you can understand this mentality then the task is manageable. This article will help you write your M.Com project for IGNOU University step by step, without overcomplicating the process.
What IGNOU Actually Expects From an M.Com Project
IGNOU does not require you to produce a PhD-level thesis. While at the same time, it does not accept simple copy-paste or casual work. The work is in between. The university is looking to make the three points clearly.
It is first to determine if you know the topic you have selected. Additionally, you should be able gather and analyze relevant data. Thirdly, can you discuss your findings systematic and organized manner.
A large number of students do not lose marks just because their research isn't strong enough the reason is that their objectives and analysis as well as their conclusions do not meet. IGNOU examiners notice this mismatch quite quickly.
Choosing the Right Topic (This Decides Half the Outcome)
The choice of topics is where the majority of students do wrong. Either they select something that is too broad or something that looks great but has no access to information. Both lead to issues later.
A good M.Com project topic is:
You can connect your syllabus to the course.
That isn't too narrow to be difficult to comprehend.
This is supported by data
For instance, "A Study of Marketing Strategies" is too vague. "A Study on Marketing Strategies of Patanjali Products in Urban Areas" is still a risky proposition even if you have data. A better option would be "A Study on Consumer Perception Towards Patanjali Products in [City Name]."
Always ask yourself one basic query prior to deciding on a topic: Can I realistically find out the information I need within My time and money? If the answer is not clear, reconsider the topic.
Writing the Project Synopsis (Do Not Treat This Casually)
IGNOU requires approval of the synopsis prior to the project is completed. Many students hurry through this phase and then regret it. The synopsis is not an exercise in formality. This is the document on the basis of which all your work will be considered.
A standard M.Com description of project to IGNOU includes:
Title of the study
Introduction
Statement of the problem
Objectives
Research methodology
Scope and limitations
Chapter scheme
References
The objectives should be clearly defined and concise in their numbers. Three to five objectives is ideal. Ten objectives will only cause confusion in the analysis. When the synopsis was approved refrain from changing the topic or method. Deliberate deviations usually lead to rejection in the course of evaluation.
Structure of an IGNOU M.Com Project Report
IGNOU uses a standard academic structure. The students don't gain extra marks by experimenting with formats. Do what you can to do.
Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter explains what the research is about and why it's important. It also explains the background to the subject, the problem statement, the objectives, scope and limitations.
The statement of the problem shouldn't be dramatic. It should clearly state the gap or problem the study is trying to address. Objectives should be defined clearly and clearly. This chapter will set the course for the entire project, so clarity here will save you trouble later on.
Chapter 2: Review of Literature
The literature review demonstrates that you're not operating in isolating yourself. It reviews previous studies relating to your area of study. This could include journal articles reports, theses, thesis, as well as research published.
Each subject should be clearly explained. Be careful not to fill this chapter with unnecessary details. The aim is to demonstrate what has already been studied as well as how your project fits within. The chapter should conclude with a brief synopsis of studies that link earlier ones with your research enhances the section.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
This is one of the most important chapters from an evaluation point an evaluation point of. It explains how the study was conducted.
The following should be clearly noted:
Research design
Sources of data (primary and secondary)
Sample size and sampling method
Data collection tools are used by various tools.
The methods used to analyze
If you utilized questionnaires, note the manner in which these were distributed. Give whom. If you used other data, you must clearly identify the sources. Avoid vague explanations. This is where precision can be a source of credibility.
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Interpretation
This chapter is the one that carries the most significance of your plan. Data should be presented via charts, tables, or graphs in the event that it is required. In addition, every data table should be accompanied with explanation.
Many students make the erroneous mistake of explicating what the table will show instead of what it means. Interpretation must connect the data to the goal of the study. If one of the goals is to evaluate customer satisfaction, your interpretation must clearly define what the data tells us about satisfaction levels.
Chapter 5: Findings, Suggestions, and Conclusion
This chapter summarises the results of the study. Results should be written point-wise and directly derived from the analysis. Proposals must be factual and based on the findings not personal thoughts.
The conclusion should summarize the reason for the study and the overall result. Avoid introducing new findings or arguments in this section. A concise conclusion leaves better impression rather than a lengthy summary.
Writing Style That Works for IGNOU Evaluation
IGNOU prefers a simple, straightforward academic language. You do not need complex vocabulary. What is important is that your ideas are easy to understand.
Write in the third person. Keep the tense consistent. Avoid emotional language. But, at the same time you should not write as the machine. Natural flow and clearly written explanations is best.
Formatting should conform to academic requirements:
A4 size paper
1-inch margins
12-point font
1.5 line spacing
Numbering of pages in the correct way
Figures and tables should be numbered and titled. References must be consistently listed.
Mistakes That Cost Students Marks
The biggest threat is plagiarism. Copying material directly from websites or past projects is easily detected. Even even if plagiarism software has not been being used, examiners can identify repeatedly copied content.
Another common mistake is poor alignment. Objectives talk about one thing, an analysis will show something else and conclusions talk about something completely different. This is an indication of weak planning.
The failure to adhere to synopsis approval requirements and making a submission that is considerably from the approved version could cause issues.
Final Check Before Submission
Before submitting, read the entire project, rather than chapter-by-chapter. Verify that the flow makes sense. Check references, tables, and formatting. Be sure that certificates, declarations as well as acknowledgements are provided according to IGNOU guidelines.
By submitting a neat and organised project on time eliminates unnecessary anxiety in the final stages.
Final Words
Writing an M.Com project for IGNOU Project MCOM (Going On this page) University is less about the ability to think and most importantly, discipline. Students who make plans early stick to approved guidelines and compose their essays with integrity rarely face rejection. The essay is an opportunity to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of subjects related to commerce, not a test of advanced research jargon.