For many students in IGNOU review, reviewing research becomes the most confusing aspect of their project. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou project for mcom, where academic rigor is expected, but the guidance feels a bit limited. Students generally ask whether they require a summation of their books, make journal articles more readable, or simply collect quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.
A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much content you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the existing work related to the topic you're researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theories with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before writing anything, must be understood why this chapter is essential to an ignou MCOM project work IGNOU (L.V.Eli.NE.S.Swxzu@Hu.Feng.Ku.Angn..Ub..Xn--.Xn--.U.K37@Www.Mandolinman.it) project. Literature review serves three essential functions.
In the first place, it indicates that the topic you chose is one that has been studied in the past and has relevance to academic research. The second is that it assists you to detect gaps or deficiencies in prior research. Thirdly, it serves as an outline for your research objectives and methodology.
Many students approach this chapter as a formality, and copy content from earlier projects or online sources. This usually leads to the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU requires original work even in discussions of studies already completed.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not require students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. While doing so it is recommended that students write in a simple way. discouraged. For an ignou mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.
You are expected to review research papers, books, journals, reports, and even government publications pertaining to your topic. The focus should be on studies that directly connect with the area of your study.
As an example, if the project focuses on the performance of financials of banks If so, your literature analysis will focus on prior studies concerning financial ratios profitability analysis, banking performance, and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an ignou project approximately fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice in the event that they are carefully selected.
An excellent source of information is academic journals popular books written by well-known creators, RBI publishing, state reports as well as university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.
Always opt for recent studies most likely from the past ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they are fundamental in terms of.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized and organized chapter enhances quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing random summaries, divide chapters of a literature analysis into logical sections.
You can organize the chapter based on themes, time period, methodology, or variables investigated. For instance, one chapter may cover studies related profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and the third on operational efficiency.
This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not simply copying content, but rather analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.
Each study you discuss should contain the name of author, the year of study, the purpose, method, and major findings. It is not necessary to list them in a logical manner. Do your best to link one study with a different one.
For instance, after discussing one study, it is possible to be able to mention that another author's findings backed the results or countered them. This type of analysis adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of an academic chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as definition of accounting or the significance of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.
Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in the style of your personal words. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while copying shows dependency.
Students should also make sure to link the literature to their research area. Every study you mention should have a clear connection your objectives for your project.
Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the main results of the examination of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU reviewers expect you to identify what earlier researchers didn't know and where further research is required.
In a discussion of multiple studies you'll notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations in contrast to small businesses being ignored. Some studies have used secondary data, however primary data was not enough.
This gap serves as the rationale for your projects ignou.com. Without this, your project could appear monotonous.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing the review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.
Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.
Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. Citations in text work better and appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of the book review needs to last. There's no definitive rule in the case of an ignou for an mcom project, the length generally ranges from fifteen hundred between two thousand and a thousand words.
The length should depend on the level of complexity of the topic. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a focused topic needs fewer but deeper discussions.
Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis doesn't improve scores.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A researched the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results
Write as this
In the year A, Author B carried out a study on banking performance using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability improved because of better asset administration. This result was later confirmed by Author B who pointed out the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profits.
This type of approach shows understanding and analysis, which is appreciated in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to published literature reviews that have been copied. Even if you reference previously published studies, the style should be unique to your project.
Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. Rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou MCOM project, go back through the literature review carefully. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether the chapters naturally connect to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason why my study is needed. If yes then you're on the correct path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature for an ignou project isn't easy at first particularly for students returning to college after a long absence. When you realize it's focused on connection and analysis rather that memorization, the work is easy to handle.
Make time to read, think and write in your unique voice. It is reflected clearly in the final project and often marks the difference between the average submission and a high-quality one.