For many students in IGNOU studying studies can be the most challenging portion of their work. This is especially the case for those working on IGNOU's mcom projects, where academic rigor is expected. However, instruction often seems to be a little sluggish. Students often ask if they should summarize their books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.
A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the current research related to the topic you're researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link theory with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you begin writing any article, it is essential to know why the chapter exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three essential functions.
In the first place, it indicates that the subject you chose has been previously studied and has a scientific significance. The second is that it assists you to identify gaps or limitations in prior research. In addition, it can provide the foundation for your research objectives as well as your method of study.
Students often view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or online sources. This is a common practice that results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when addressing existing research.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. Additionally extremely basic explanations are also discouraged. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.
You're expected review books, research papers, journals, reports, and sometimes even government publications related with your field. The concentration should be on the studies that directly pertain to the area of your study.
For instance, if the project is on financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews must focus on earlier research in relation to financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
One common mistake students make is selecting too many non-related sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an ignou-mcom project about fifteen to twenty reliable sources will suffice If they're chosen with care.
An excellent source of information is academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous names, RBI documents, Government reports as well as university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.
Always opt for recent studies most likely from the past 10 years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're of a fundamental in nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
An organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of writing brief summaries on the fly, separate sections of the review in sensible sections.
You can organize the chapter according to themes, time period as well as the methodology or variables the authors have studied. For instance, one chapter may cover studies related profitability, while another could focus on liquidity and another one on operational efficiency.
This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're not copying content, you are actually analysing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style must be formal but not abrasive. Avoid overly complicated language and use of jargon. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.
The study you are discussing should include the name of the author as well as year of study, research objectives, methods, and principal findings. However, you shouldn't list them mechanically. It is best to connect one study with another.
For example, after discussing one study, you could discuss how a different author's findings supported or refuted these findings. The comparative approach adds more complexity to your ignou project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common error is writing the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Basic concepts such as the definition of accounting or the meaning of management doesn't belong here unless directly linked in previous studies.
Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in an individual way. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying indicates dependence.
They also fail to link books to their own research area. Each study you discuss should have a clear connection your research goals.
Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the major outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluaters want you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not and where further research is required.
When you look over a range of studies you may observe that most research focused on large organizations but small companies were absent. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, however primary data were not sufficient.
This gap becomes the justification for your project IGNOU MCOM project help (please click Blackhistorydaily) mcom. Without it, your work will seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing the review of literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.
Each study that is discussed should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.
Avoid footnotes for literature review. The in-text citation is better and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of the review of literature must last. There's no definitive rule but for an mcom project, this chapter generally spans from fifteen to and two thousand words.
The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. A broad topic will require more research, while a specific topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.
Inadequately long reviews and no any analysis doesn't increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A researched banking's performance and obtained good results
Write it like this
For example, author A conducted a study of bank performance using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability increased by a better management of assets. This result was later confirmed by Author B, who emphasized the role played by operation efficiency in improving returns to banks.
This approach is based on an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get blocked or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. Even if you cite previously published studies, the style is yours.
Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect is better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting an ignou mcom project, reread the entire literature review. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for why my study is needed. If the answer is yes, then it's on the right track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature for an ignou project is not easy at first especially for students returning to academics after a gap. Once you realize that it's all about connection and analysis rather than memorization of information, the task is manageable.
Make time to read, consider, and write in your personal voice. This dedication is clearly reflected on the final piece and often can be the difference in an average submission and a strong one.