For many students enrolled in IGNOU The review of literature becomes the most confusing element of the project. This is particularly true for those working on an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected, but the guidance seems to be a little sluggish. Students generally ask whether they must write summaries of books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply gather quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

Literature reviews are not meant to display how much of the literature you've read. It's written to demonstrate how much you comprehend current work in relation to your field and how your project is integrated into it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before composing anything, it is important to understand why this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three primary purposes.

First, it shows that the subject you have chosen is one that has been studied in the past and has a scientific significance. Furthermore, it will help you determine the gaps or shortcomings in prior research. Thirdly, it serves as the foundation for your studies' goals and research methodology.

Most students view this section as a formality and duplicate content from previous assignments or online sources. This often results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU demands original writing even when discussing previous studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. However extremely basic explanations are also discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

You'll be expected to read books, research papers journal articles, reports, and even government publications pertaining to your topic. The primary focus should be on research relevant to your area of study.

In this case, for example, if your study is about the financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously on financial ratios, performances of banks, profitability studies, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. It is the quality that matters more than the quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient for a good selection.

Academic journals are a good option popular books written by well-known authors, RBI publications, federal reports as well as university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent that are from the last 10 years. The older studies may be included but only if it is foundational in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves readability and impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split an overview of literature into clear sections.

You could organize the chapter by theme, time period and methodology or even variables researched. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and another focus on efficiency in operations.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you are not just taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is to be professional but easy. Avoid dense language and excessive use of jargon. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Each study that you talk about must include the name of the author, the year of study, the goal, methodology, and the major findings. Don't mention them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study with another.

For instance, after discussing one study, you could highlight how another author's study supported or refuted these findings. This sort of comparative approach will add richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as the textbook chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as definition of accounting or the significance of management is not a good idea in this article unless they are directly linked to other studies.

Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written by you in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying indicates dependence.

Many students do not connect books to their own research focus. Every research you present should be clearly connected to your research objectives.

Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU evaluators expect you to expose what researchers of the past missed or indicate areas where further research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies it is possible to observe that the majority research focused on large organizations as small businesses were overlooked. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, but primary data was not as extensive.

This gap can be the motivation for your Ingou MCOM IGNOU solved project (This Resource site) project. Without it, your program could appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but consistent writing is more important than flawlessness.

Every study discussed must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the literature review should run. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred between two thousand and a thousand words.

The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of the bank's performance and got good results

Write as this
Author A conducted a research study on bank performance using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability improved because of improved asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B who stressed the role of operational efficiency in increasing return on investment for banks.

This method is based on an understanding and analysis that is a must in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to copied literature reviews. Even if you cite previous research, the language ought to be uniquely yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou mcom project, read the entire literature review. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if the flow is logical, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason what my study needs to be done. If yes you're on the correct track.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project might be difficult at first in particular for students who are returning to university after a gap. When you realize it's all about connection and analysis rather than memorizing information, the task is manageable.

Read, consider, and write in your unique voice. This is reflected in the final work. It often is the difference between one that is average and a high-quality one.