For a lot of students studying at IGNOU The review of literature can be the most confusing component of their project. This is especially true for students working on an ignou MCOM project in which academic depth is expected, however guidance often feels a bit limited. Students usually ask if require a summation of their books, make journal articles more readable, or simply collect quotes. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing that a distinction could alter the overall quality of the project.
A literature review is NOT written to illustrate how much literature you've read. It is written to show your understanding of the literature that is relevant to your topic and how your project fits within it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter as it shows your ability to link the theory and research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before beginning any writing, it is crucial to understand why the section exists in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three major purposes.
It first shows that the subject you chose has been studied earlier and has academic relevance. Second, it aids you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. Thirdly, it gives you an understanding of research goals and your methodology.
Students often view this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous projects or other sources online. This often results in the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU expects original writing even when discussing the results of existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. While doing so simple explanations are prohibited. In an ignou project the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.
You'll be expected to read books, research papers Journals, reports, or even publications from the government that relate to your subject. The primary focus should be on research which directly relate to the area of your study.
For example, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should include earlier studies in relation to financial ratios bank performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
One common mistake students make is choosing too many different sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom, around fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough should they be selected carefully.
Academic journals are a good option, reputed books by known names, RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.
The best studies are those that are current that are from the last ten years. Some older studies are acceptable only if they're foundational in their nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter enhances comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing random summaries of the work, break down all the reviews of books into logical sections.
You can organize the chapter around themes, a time period as well as the methodology or variables that are studied. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and the third regarding operational efficiency.
This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you are not just copying content. You are actually studying it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.
Each study you present should be accompanied by the name of the author, year of study, goal, methodology, and most important results. However, you shouldn't list them in a logical manner. Do your best to link one study with another.
For instance, following discussion of the findings of one study, you could be able to mention that another author's findings backed or opposed those findings. This comparative approach adds depth to your ignou MCOM project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
The most common error is writing the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like understanding of accounting's definition or of management should not be included in this section unless it is directly connected to prior studies.
Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written by you in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while the copying of your review shows dependency.
They are also often unable to link works to their research topic. Any study you discuss must be in a direct connection to your goals for the project.
Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the most important outcomes of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU evaluations expect you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or if further research is required.
In a discussion of multiple studies you will notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations but small companies were overlooked. In the past, studies utilized secondary data but primary data were not sufficient.
This gap is the basis for your initiative with ignou MCOM. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing the review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.
Each research study should be included in the reference list at the end of the study. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.
Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. The in-text citation is better and appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of their literature reviews should last. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter generally spans from fifteen to between two thousand and a thousand words.
The length of the discussion should be based on how complex the topic is. For a broad topic, you will need more research while a concentrated topic will require less but deeper discussions.
Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis is not going to improve your marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results
Write like this
This author conducted a study of bank performance using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability increased due to better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B in his study, who focused on the role played by operating efficiency in boosting bank profitability.
This approach reflects the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is considered important in an ignou MCOM IGNOU solved project (http://--8sbo8baj6f.рф/bitrix/redirect.php?goto=http://www.aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread) project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get rejected or delayed due to plagiarism in literature reviews. However, even if you use previous studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.
Use plagiarism checking tools as possible and rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect will be more appealing than perfect copying.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, go back through the review carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, if you can follow the logic of the review and whether it is linked naturally to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, this review of literature is definitely on the right track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature for an ignou mcom project may initially be challenging particularly for students who are returning to university after a gap. However, once you realize that it is about connection and analysis, rather than recitation, the challenge becomes easier to manage.
You should take the time to read, think, and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected in your final work and often determines the difference between an average submission and a powerful one.