In the case of many students at IGNOU The review of literature can be the most complicated section of the work. This is especially the case in the case of an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often isn't available. Students generally ask whether they must write summaries of books, rewrite journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.
Literature reviews are not intended to be a record of the quantity of information you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the works that are currently being done on the topic of your choice and how you project fits in. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link knowledge with research directions.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before writing anything, is vital to understand the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three essential functions.
First, it shows that the subject matter you've chosen has been previously studied and has a scientific significance. In addition, it allows you to discover gaps or issues in previous studies. In addition, it can provide a base for your research goals and the methodology.
Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous assignments or web-based sources. This typically results in lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU expects original writing even when discussing previous studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of the PhD thesis. However explaining in the simplest way is not permitted. For an ignou mcom project the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.
You're expected review books, research papers or reports, journals and sometimes government publications related to your field of study. The focus should be on studies related to your research topic.
As an example, if the task is to study the financial performance of banks and banks, then your literature search should focus on prior research dealing with financial ratios the performance of banks, profitability analysis and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
One common mistake students make is picking too many unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. If you are looking to build an ignou mcom business approximately fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough when they're well-chosen.
Academic journals are a good option as well as reputable books by renowned author, RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.
It is always best to choose recent studies particularly those that have been published in the last ten years. It is possible to include older studies only if they're fundamental in their nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well organized chapter improves readability and impression. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate each literature overview into logical sections.
You can arrange the chapter according to themes, time period, methodology, or variables that are studied. For example, one section could focus on studies related profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, while another about operational effectiveness.
This structure can help evaluators realize that you're not copying content, but you are analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing must be formal but not abrasive. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary terms. IGNOU MCOM project synopsis favors clarity over complexity.
Each study you discuss should include the name of the author as well as year of study, goals, methodology, as well as important findings. Be careful not to list them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study with a different one.
In the case of discussing some research, you might refer to how an author's findings were supported or disputed those findings. The comparative approach adds more depth to your ignou MCOM project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
An error that is often made is to write the literature review as a textbook chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management is not a good idea here unless directly linked to studies that have been done previously.
Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written in your own words. Reading from the source shows understanding, and using copying can show dependency.
Students should also make sure to link publications to their personal research topic. Any study you discuss must have a clear link to the research goals.
Connection of Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the main outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the research gap. IGNOU examiners expect you demonstrate what researchers in the past did not realize or if further research is required.
After looking over several studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large organizations but small companies were ignored. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, whereas primary data was limited.
This gap becomes the justification for your projects ignou.com. Without it, the project might appear to be repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
In writing a review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.
Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.
Avoid footnotes when reviewing literature. A citation in text works better and appears cleaner in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often inquire about how long their literature reviews should be. There's no set timeframe but, for an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred up to two thousand words.
The length should be determined by the complexity of the topic. A broad topic will require more studies, while a targeted topic requires fewer, but more extensive discussions.
Reviewing unnecessarily long without analysis doesn't improve scores.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing as this
The author analyzed the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results
Write it like this
Write as this: Author A carried out a study on the performance of banks using financial ratios. It concluded that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role of operational efficiency when it comes to improving returns for banks.
This approach displays understanding and analysis, which is appreciated in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to copies of literature reviews. Even if you reference earlier studies, the language is yours.
Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect will be more appealing than perfect copying.
Final Review Before Submission
Before you submit your ignou project, reread the entire literature review. You should determine whether the research is relevant, whether the flow is logical and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter clarify the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes your research paper is right on track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a literature review for an ignou project might be difficult at first particularly for students who are returning to school after a break. When you realize it is all about connection and analysis rather that memorization, the work becomes easier to manage.
Spend time reading, think and write with your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in your final product and often can be the difference in being a weak submission and an average one. well-crafted one.