For a lot of students studying at IGNOU review, reviewing literature can be the most elusive aspect of their project. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou MCOM project in which academic depth is expected, yet guidance frequently isn't available. Students typically ask if they are required to summarize books or amend journal articles, and simply gather quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding this distinction can alter the overall quality of the project.

A literature review is not intended to be a record of how much content you've read. It is written to show that you are knowledgeable about the works that are currently being done on your topic and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to this chapter since it showcases your ability to link theory with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, however, it is crucial to understand why this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three main purposes.

In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected has been researched before and has a scholarly significance. In addition, it allows you to detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. The third is that it creates an understanding of research goals and methods.

Many students see this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier assignments or other online sources. This is a common practice that results in failing marks or even rejection of the project. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. The same time any explanation that is not basic is being discouraged. When a ignou mcom project is being developed the literature review should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

You're expected review research papers, books journal articles, reports, and sometimes even government publications related with your field. The attention should be focused on studies that directly connect with your research area.

For instance, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you should focus on prior research dealing with financial ratios financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake made by students is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. In the case of an ignou MCOM project between 15 and 20 powerful sources are generally enough provided they are selected with care.

The best sources are academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous names, RBI publishing, state reports and university level research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research at least from the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered only if they're foundational in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances readability and impression. Instead of writing brief summaries on the fly, separate sections of the review in clear sections.

You can arrange the chapter according to themes, time period methods, or variables the authors have studied. For example, one section might discuss studies on the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and another focused on the efficiency of operations.

This structure aids in understanding the difference between copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style is to be professional but easy. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary words. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Every study you review should include the author name, year of study, goals, methodology, as well as significant findings. However, you shouldn't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Make sure to connect one study with another.

For instance, after discussing one study, it is possible to be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This method of comparison adds the depth of your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review like it is a textbook chapter. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like definition of accounting or meaning of management do not belong here unless directly linked in previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in your own words. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas the copying of your review shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link the literature to their research focus. Every study you reference must be clearly linked to your goals for the project.

Linking Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important results of the examination of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to expose what researchers of the past missed or the areas in which further research is required.

After looking over several studies, it is possible to observe that the majority research was focused on large companies and small businesses were not considered. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.

This gap serves as the rationale for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your work will appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing the review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each study must be mentioned in the list of references at the end of the study. References that are not included raise doubts about authenticity.

Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. Citations in text work better and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of an essay on literature should be. There is no fixed rule to follow, but for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred at to two thousand.

The length should be determined by how complex the topic is. A bigger topic will require more study, while a narrowly focused subject requires less but more extensive discussions.

Writing excessively long reviews without analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing this way,
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance, and found positive results

Create this type of writing
In the year A, Author B conducted a study on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B who stressed the role played by operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank returns.

This approach reflects the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is a must in an MCOM project work IGNOU - www.jovedata.com.br, project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get refused or delayed because of plagiarism in literature reviews. Although you may refer to previously published studies, the style should be unique to your project.

Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom project, reread the literature review attentively. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, whether the flow of information is clear, and whether it is linked naturally to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If yes, then this review of literature is definitely on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review to be used in an ignou mcom assignment isn't easy at first especially for students returning to academics after a gap. If you can realize that it's about analysis and connection rather than memorization of information, the task becomes easy.

Spend time reading, think and write with your own voice. This effort will be evident on your final product and often is the difference between being a weak submission and an average one. powerful one.