There are many students who enroll in IGNOU and IGNOU, the study of literature is often the most difficult aspect of their project. This is particularly true for students working on an ignou mcom project, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often seems to be a little sluggish. Students usually ask if should write down their book chapters, rewrite journal articles, or simply gather quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing how different approaches can impact the overall quality of the project.
Literature reviews are not written to show how much of the literature you've read. It is written to show how well you know the previous work that pertains to your subject and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link theories with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you write anything, it must be understood why this chapter is necessary in an IGNOU MCOM project help (kolesa777.ru) MCOM project. Literature review serves three major purposes.
First, it demonstrates that the subject you picked has been extensively studied as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Furthermore, it will help you identify gaps or limitations in prior research. The third is that it creates a base for your research goals and the methodology.
Most students view this section as a formality and copy content from previous projects or other sources online. This often results in small marks or project failure. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing the results of existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. While doing so, very basic explanations are as well discouraged. For an ignou MCOM project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.
You're expected review research papers, books Journals, reports, and occasionally, government publications that relate to your topic. The main focus should be on those studies that directly link to the research area you are studying.
As an example, if the study is about the financial performance of banks In your literature review, you must focus on earlier research that dealt with financial ratios, bank performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake made by students is picking too many unrelated sources. More important is quality than quantity. For an ignou project approximately fifteen to twenty good sources can be found in the event that they are carefully selected.
The best sources are academic journals that are reputable, well-known books by famous the authors RBI documents, Government reports and even university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.
Always pick studies from recent years particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. These older studies may be included only if they are fundamental in terms of.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter increases understanding and perception. Instead of composing random summaries, break up an overview of literature into sensible sections.
The chapter can be organized according to themes, time period, methodology, or variables researched. For instance, one chapter could discuss research related to the financial performance, while another may focus on liquidity, and another regarding operational efficiency.
This structure can help evaluators realize that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing should be straightforward but academic. Avoid dense language and excessive terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.
Every study you review should include the name of its author, year of study, goals, methodology, as well as the major findings. But, don't list the findings in a way that is purely mechanical. Do your best to link one study with a different one.
For instance, after discussing one study, you may describe how another researcher supported the results or countered them. This method of comparison adds complexity to your ignou project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common mistake is to write the literature review like the textbook chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as how accounting works or the meaning of management are not needed here unless directly linked to earlier studies.
Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your literature review should be written in the style of your personal words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying implies dependence.
Students should also make sure to link sources to their own research field. Any study you discuss must be clearly connected to the goals of your project.
Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap
The most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you show what earlier researchers missed or the areas where more study is required.
After discussing multiple studies, you'll find that a lot of studies centered on large organizations but small companies were neglected. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, however primary data was scarce.
The gap in the picture is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, the project might seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When you write a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.
Every study to be discussed must be included in the reference list at the conclusion of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.
Avoid footnotes for literature review. A citation in text works better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often inquire about how long an essay on literature should run. There's no definitive rule however, for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter usually ranges between fifteen hundred at to two thousand.
The length should depend on your topic's complexity. A broader topic requires more research. A specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.
The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include analysis doesn't improve scores.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A has studied bank performance and came across positive results
Write like this
In the year A, Author B conducted a research study on bank performance by using financial ratios. He concluded that profitability improved through better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of the efficiency of operations in enhancing return on investment for banks.
This approach displays the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is a must in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to published literature reviews that have been copied. If you do refer to past studies, your language you use must reflect the original.
Use plagiarism detection tools if possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is much better than perfect copying.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, read the review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain the reasons for my research. If yes this review of literature is definitely on the right path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature for an ignou-mcom project is not easy at first particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. Once you realize that it is focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization, the project is easy to handle.
Do your best to read, think and write in your personal voice. This dedication is clearly reflected in the final draft and often can be the difference in an average submission and a solid one.