For a lot of students studying at IGNOU, the review of literature can be the most elusive element of the project. This is particularly true for those who are working on an ignou mcom assignment, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often isn't as clear. Students typically ask if they must write summaries of books, amend journal articles, and simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that difference can change the overall quality of the project.
A literature review is not written to reveal how much literature you've read. It is written to show your understanding of the existing work related to your topic and how your idea fits in with it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter since it showcases your ability to link knowledge with research directions.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you begin writing any article, it must be understood why the section exists in an IGNOU MCOM project topics (https://3537.xg4ken.com/media/redir.php?prof=401&cid=168377447&url[]=http://Www.aykhal.info/go/url=http://N.i.Gh.t.m.a.re.zzro@masuda-khrs.sakura.ne.jp/hsy/yybbs/yybbs.cgi?list=thread) mcom project. Literature reviews serve three essential functions.
First, it shows it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been previously studied and is of academic importance. In addition, it allows you to detect gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. Thirdly, it gives you an understanding of research goals and the methodology.
Many students treat this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous projects or even from online sources. This can result in negative marks or project rejection. IGNOU does not require original writing when addressing existing research.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. On the other hand the use of very basic explanations is prohibited. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.
You're expected to study books, research papers Journals, reports, and sometimes, government publications related to your area of study. The emphasis should be placed on studies that directly link to your research area.
In this case, for example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks If so, your literature analysis must focus on earlier research that dealt with financial ratios, profitability analysis, banking performance and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common error students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. More important is quality than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom approximately fifteen to twenty quality sources are usually sufficient in the event that they are carefully selected.
A good source is academic journals popular books written by well-known author, RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.
It is always best to choose recent studies at least from the last ten years. Older studies can be included only if they are foundational in way.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter enhances readability and impression. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate this literature summary into logical sections.
You can structure the chapter using themes, period, methodology, or variables researched. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity, and a third focus on efficiency in operations.
The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're not simply taking content and copying it, but also analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary jargon. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.
The study you are discussing should include the author's name, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and principal findings. But, don't list them in a linear manner. Try connecting one study to another.
For instance, when discussing one study, it is possible to be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This kind of approach can add an additional dimension to your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
An error that is often made is to write the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management is not a good idea in this section unless it is directly connected to previous research.
Another error is overquoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying shows dependence.
They are also often unable to link works to their research issue. The research you refer to should have a clear connection to the goals of your project.
Links Literature Review with Research Gap
The most important outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU assessment committees expect you show what earlier researchers missed or indicate areas where further research is required.
In a discussion of multiple studies you'll realize that most studies centered on large organizations and small businesses were overlooked. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data, while primary data was not as extensive.
This void is the reason for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project could appear repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
In writing a review of literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.
Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.
Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citations in text work better and appears better in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of the reviews of books should be. There's no definitive rule but, for an ignou mcom project, this chapter usually ranges between fifteen hundred to two thousand words.
The length should depend on the level of complexity of the topic. A broad topic will require greater research, whereas a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.
A review that is too long and without an analysis won't help marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A has studied the performance of banks and came up with positive results
Create this type of writing
Write as this: Author A conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios. They found that profitability improved by a better management of assets. This finding was later supported by Author B who stressed the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank profitability.
This method is based on the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is highly valued in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get cancelled or delayed due duplicated literature reviews. Even if you cite previously published studies, the style ought to be uniquely yours.
Utilize plagiarism checking software if possible. Rewrite content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is more effective than perfect copying.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou MCOM task, revisit your literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if the flow of the study is coherent and if it is linked naturally to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the need for my study. If yes, you're on the correct track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature for a ignou mcom project may initially be challenging Particularly for students returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you understand that it's about analysis and connection rather than memorization of information, the task is manageable.
Spend time reading, think and write in your own voice. That effort reflects clearly in the final draft and can make the difference between the average submission and a outstanding one.