For a lot of students studying at IGNOU, the review of studies can be the most challenging part of the assignment. This is especially the case for students working on an ignou MCOM project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance often isn't available. Students usually inquire if they need to summarize books, amend journal articles, and simply collect quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the overall quality of the project.
A review of literature is NOT written to illustrate how much you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the prior work on the topic you're researching and how your project fits in. IGNOU reviewers are attentive to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link theory with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before writing anything, must be understood why this chapter is necessary in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three essential functions.
In the first place, it indicates it is clear that the topic you've chosen is one that has been studied in the past and has a scholarly significance. Additionally, it can help you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. Thirdly, it gives you an outline of your research goals and methods.
Many students approach this chapter as a formality and take content from other projects or even from online sources. This usually leads to lower marks or rejection of projects. IGNOU demands original writing even when addressing existing research.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. But, very basic explanations are not permitted. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.
You're expected to study books, research papers report, journals, and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your subject. The attention should be focused on studies related to your area of study.
For example, if you study is about the financial performance of banks So, your literature reviews should be focused on previous studies on financial ratios, performances of banks, profitability studies and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake that students make is selecting too many non-related sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in IGNOU MCOM project writing services (http://--7sblghfjkylkm3a.рф/) roughly fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough as long as they're carefully chosen.
An excellent source of information is academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned creators, RBI documents, Government reports and university level research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.
Always prefer recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. Older studies can be included only if they're fundamental in their nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter increases readership and impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide chapters of a literature analysis into sensible sections.
The chapter could be structured around themes, a time period as well as the methodology or variables researched. For instance, one chapter may focus on research studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, while another focused on the efficiency of operations.
This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you are not just copying content, but actually analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid a lot of language and words. IGNOU prefers simplicity over clarity.
The study you are discussing should contain the name of author, year of study, purpose, method, and major findings. However, you shouldn't list them in a linear manner. Do your best to link one study with another.
If you're discussing one study, you may mention how another author supported the results or countered them. The comparative approach adds more depth to your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common mistake is to write the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Explaining basic concepts such as understanding of accounting's definition or of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked with previous research.
Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in yourself. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas copying shows dependency.
Students also forget to link the literature to their research study. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection the goals of your project.
Linking Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the major outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or the areas where more study is required.
After examining a variety of studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focused on large firms smaller firms were overlooked. Some studies have used secondary data, but the primary data was not as extensive.
The gap in the picture is the reason for your project in the ignou mcom. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
While writing a review for literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but it is more about consistency than perfection.
Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.
Avoid footnotes during a literature review. The in-text citation is better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often inquire about how long the reviews of books should run. There isn't a set rule and for an ignou mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred at to two thousand.
The length should depend on topics' complexity. A topic that is more extensive requires more research while a specific topic requires fewer but more in-depth discussions.
Writing excessively long reviews without an analysis won't help marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A conducted a study of banking performance and found good results
Write it like this
An author conducted a study about banking performance with financial ratios. He concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B and Author B, who emphasised the role of operational efficiency in improving bank returns.
This strategy demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of copy-pasted literature reviews. If you do refer to earlier studies, the language is yours.
Use plagiarism checking tools as possible. If you are able, modify your content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly imperfect can be better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou master of commerce project, read the literature review attentively. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow of the study is coherent, and whether the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter provide a reason the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes, then your review on literature will be in the best path.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a literature review as part of an ignou master's thesis may feel challenging at first particularly for those returning back to their academics after a period of. If you can realize that it is more about analysis and connecting than memorizing information, the task can be accomplished.
Take time to read, think, and write in your unique voice. It is reflected clearly in the final draft and can make the difference between an average project and a impressive one.
