For many students in IGNOU studying literature can be the most elusive element of the project. This is particularly true for those working on the ignou master's degree project in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance often can be difficult to find. Students typically ask if they must write summaries of books, edit journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that difference can change the quality of the entire project.

A literature review is not intended to demonstrate how much content you've read. It is written to show your understanding of the prior work on the topic you're researching and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to connect knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you write anything, it is vital to understand the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three major purposes.

First, it demonstrates that the subject you have chosen has been previously studied and has a scholarly significance. The second is that it assists you to determine the gaps or shortcomings in previous studies. Thirdly, it gives you an outline of your studies' goals and research methodology.

Many students take this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or online sources. This typically results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU demands original writing even when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. The same time it is recommended that students write in a simple way. discouraged. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

You are expected to review books, research papers journal articles, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant in your research topic. The primary focus should be on research which are directly related to your area of study.

For example, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks, then your literature review should focus on prior research about financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is to select too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For an ignou project approximately fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough in the event that they are carefully selected.

Some good sources are academic journals and reputable books written by well-known authors RBI publication, reports from the government, and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always pick studies from recent years and ideally, from the last ten years. The older studies may be included only if they are foundational in the nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter enhances readability and impression. Instead of writing brief summaries on the fly, separate the literature review into sensible sections.

You could organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period techniques, methodologies, or variables which are being studied. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and yet another one on operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding the difference between copying content. You are actually studying it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be simple and academic. Beware of a long, rambling style and unnecessary terms. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Each research study you write about should include the name of the author as well as year of study, purpose, method, and main findings. Don't mention them in a formal manner. Try connecting one study to another.

For example, after discussing your findings from one study, be able to mention that another author's findings backed or disputed those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review like the textbook chapter. In explaining the basics of concepts like what accounting is and the meaning of management doesn't belong in this article unless they are directly linked in previous studies.

Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in you own language. In the end, paraphrasing is an indication of understanding, while copying shows dependency.

Students may also not link sources to their own research subject. Any study you discuss must have a clear connection with your research goals.

Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the major result of reviewing literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or the areas in which further research is needed.

After looking over several studies, you'll realize that most studies were focused on large businesses in contrast to small businesses being not considered. And earlier studies used secondary data but primary data was scarce.

This gap becomes the justification for your an ignou project. Without it, the project might appear repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

In writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU MCOM project submission guide, demoscene.hu, generally supports APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.

Each research study should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. Missing references create doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes for literature review. A text-based citation is more efficient and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often ask how long the reviews of books should run. There's not a standard for length, but for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter generally spans from fifteen to to two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topics' complexity. For a broad topic, you will need additional research while a more narrowly-focused topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no analysis will not help improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
The author analyzed banking's performance and obtained good results

Create this type of writing
An author conducted a study on banking performance using financial ratios, and concluded that profitability improved because of better asset administration. The findings were later confirmed by Author B who stressed the importance of operation efficiency in improving return on investment for banks.

This is an approach that demonstrates an understanding and analysis that is what counts in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are blocked or rejected because of published literature reviews that have been copied. If you do refer to previous research, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Check for plagiarism using tools if possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom task, revisit the entire literature review. Be sure to check if each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapters naturally connect to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the reason for why I need to study it. If yes your review on literature will be in the best path.

Closing Thoughts

Reviewing literature for a ignou mcom project could be daunting at first particularly for students returning to school after a long hiatus. However, once you realize that it's about connection and analysis, rather than memorization, the project can be accomplished.

Be sure to read, think, and write with your own voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent in the final work. It often marks the difference between an average submission and a impressive one.