For many students in IGNOU reviews of books is the most confusing part of the project work. This is especially true for those working on an IGNOU MCOM project writing services [Www.bolnicaleskovac.org] mcom project, where academic rigor is expected but guidance often isn't clear. Students usually inquire if they should write down their book chapters, amend journal articles, and simply take notes of quotations. In reality, there is a place between, and understanding that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.
Literature reviews are not meant to display how much you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend existing work related to the topic you're researching and how your project is a part of it. IGNOU examiners examine the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to connect concepts with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before composing anything, it important to be aware of the reason the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three main functions.
First, it demonstrates that the subject you have chosen already has been explored as well as having a relevance for academic studies. Second, it helps you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier studies. The third is that it creates an understanding of research objectives and methodology.
Students often view this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous projects or other sources online. This approach usually results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU does not require original writing when presenting existing work.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. At the same time simple explanations are too much to be avoided. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment, the review of literature must reflect the postgraduate understanding.
You're required to read books, research papers Journals, reports, and even government publications pertaining to your research area. The focus should be on studies that directly pertain to your research field.
In the case of example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks So, your literature reviews should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously on financial ratios, profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
The most common mistake students make is deciding to use too many disparate sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. For an ignou project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 solid sources are typically enough should they be selected carefully.
Good sources include academic journals, reputed books by known creators, RBI documents, Government reports as well as university research papers. Websites with unclear authorship should be avoided.
Always opt for recent studies which are typically from the last 10 years. Some older studies are acceptable but only if it is foundational in the sense that they are fundamental in.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter increases the readability and impact. Instead of composing brief summaries on the fly, separate all the reviews of books into logical sections.
The chapter can be organized using themes, period as well as the methodology or variables that are studied. For example, one section may examine studies that pertain to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity and the third focus on efficiency in operations.
This structure assists evaluators to understand that you're not copying content, but actually analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary language. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.
The study you are discussing should include the author name, the year of study, the research objectives, methods, and the main findings. Be careful not to list them in a formal manner. It is best to connect one study to another.
For example, after analyzing one study, you may mention how another author supported or refuted the findings. This comparative approach adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common error is writing the literature review in the form of the kind of chapter in a textbook. Basic concepts such as the definition of accounting or the meaning of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked in previous studies.
Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written by you in yourself. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying shows dependency.
Students often fail to connect sources to their own research subject. Each study you discuss should be in line with your research goals.
The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the major results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU evaluations expect you to expose what researchers of the past missed or indicate areas where further research is needed.
After having discussed a myriad of studies you'll notice that the majority of studies focused on large corporations and small businesses were left out. The earlier studies also used secondary data, but primary data were not sufficient.
This void is the reason for your ignou mcom project. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing the review of literature The proper citation of the source is essential. IGNOU generally follows APA style, but being consistent is more important than achieving perfection.
Each study must be mentioned in the reference list at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.
Don't use footnotes to review literature. Citations in text work better and is more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must be. There's no definitive rule but for an mcom project, this chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred and two thousand words.
The length of the discussion should be based on your topic's complexity. A more broad subject requires more research while a focused topic needs fewer but more in-depth discussions.
The need to write lengthy reviews that do not include any analysis doesn't increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results
Write in this manner
For example, author A conducted a study of the performance of banks using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operational efficiency in boosting bank profits.
This approach displays an understanding and analysis that is a must in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are deferred or even rejected due to review of literature that has been copied. Even if you refer to past studies, your language must be your own.
Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible and rewrite content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is superior to copied perfection.
Final Review Before Submission
Prior to submitting your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review thoroughly. Check whether each study is relevant, if it flows in a logical manner and if the chapter leads naturally to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for the reasons for my research. If yes, then your literature review is on the right path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature for an ignou MCOM project can be a challenge at first especially for students returning to university after a gap. If you can realize that it's about analysis and connection rather than recitation, the challenge becomes easy.
It is important to take time to read, think and write in your unique voice. This effort will be evident in the final project and often determines the difference between one that is average and a high-quality one.
