For many students who are enrolled in IGNOU The review of books is the most confusing part of the assignment. This is particularly true in the case of the ignou mcom course, where academic rigor is expected. However, guidance usually seems to be a little sluggish. Students usually ask if require a summation of their books, revise journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that a difference could affect the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not intended to demonstrate how much content you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you know the available research on your area of study and how your project fits in. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter due to your ability to connect concepts with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before you begin writing any article, it important to be aware of the reason this particular chapter is required in an ignou MCOM project. Literature reviews serve three main functions.

First, it shows that the subject you chose is one that has been studied in the past and has academic relevance. Furthermore, it will help you discern gaps or deficiencies in previous studies. Thirdly, it establishes an outline of your research goals and your methodology.

A majority of students view this chapter as a formality and duplicate content from previous assignments or other online sources. This approach usually results in small marks or project failure. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing studies that are already in progress.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of a PhD thesis. The same time explaining in the simplest way is as well discouraged. When a ignou MCOM project work IGNOU , Recommended Web page, project is being developed, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.

The expectation is to look over research papers, books journal articles, reports, and even government publications pertaining to your area of study. The concentration should be on the studies which directly relate to your area of study.

For example, if your project focuses on the performance of financials of banks Your literature review will focus on prior studies on financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most common mistake students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For a project in ignou roughly fifteen to twenty powerful sources are generally enough If they're chosen with care.

Excellent sources include academic journals and reputable books written by well-known names, RBI publishing, state reports and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. The older studies may be included only if they're foundational in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide sections of the review in logical sections.

You may organize the chapter in accordance with themes, time period method, variables, or methodologies the authors have studied. For example, one section may discuss studies related to the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity, and another concerning operational efficiency.

This structure assists evaluators to understand the difference between replicating content but are actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing should be simple but academic. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary vocabulary. IGNOU values clarity over complexity.

Each research study you write about should include the name of the author, the year of study, the methodological objective, most important results. However, don't list them in a logical manner. Make an effort to link one study to another.

In the case of discussing one study, you may refer to how an author's findings were supported and/or refuted the findings. This sort of comparative approach will add greater depth to your project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common error is writing the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. Basic concepts such as definition of accounting or the significance of management should not be included in this article unless they are directly linked with previous research.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in the style of your personal words. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while the copying of your review shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link works to their research focus. Each study you discuss should have a clear connection your research goals.

The Linkage Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the key outcomes of a review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessment committees expect you clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate where additional research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies you may observe that most studies were focused on large businesses however small companies were ignored. The earlier studies also used secondary data but primary data were not sufficient.

This gap can be the motivation for your projects ignou.com. Without it, your program could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing a review for literature an appropriate citation is required. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however consistency is more important than perfect.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the reference list at the end of the study. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citation in text is more effective and looks cleaner in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the writing review must last. There isn't a set rule in the case of an ignou MCOM project, this chapter usually spans from fifteen cents in length to 2500 words.

The length should depend on topics' complexity. The more expansive topic requires more studies, while a specific topic requires fewer but more extensive discussions.

Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A analyzed banking performance and found good results

Create this type of writing
Write as this: Author A conducted a study of banking performance using financial ratios. They found that profitability improved through better asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role of the efficiency of operations in enhancing returns to banks.

This approach emphasizes the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is highly valued in an mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get stopped or rejected because of review of literature that has been copied. Even if your reference is to prior studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. You can also rewrite your content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is far better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou mcom assignment, you should read the literature review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, if the flow is logical and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the reason why my research is important. If yes, you're on the correct track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou mcom project is not easy at first especially for those who return to school after a long hiatus. But once you recognize that it's more about analysis and connecting than memorizing, the job is easy to handle.

Be sure to read, think and write in your own voice. This dedication is clearly reflected into the final version of your work. This often determines the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a powerful one.