There are many students who enroll in IGNOU reviewing literature can be the most confusing aspect of the work. This is especially the case for those who are working on an ignou project for mcom, in which academic depth is expected but guidance often isn't as clear. Students usually inquire if they must write summaries of books, revise journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and understanding that the difference can impact the quality of the entire project.
A literature review is not meant to display how much you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the previous work that pertains to your subject and how your project fits in. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter, as it illustrates your ability to link concepts with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you write anything, it must be understood why this chapter is essential to an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three main goals.
It first shows that the subject you have chosen has been researched before and has relevance to academic research. In addition, it allows you to find gaps or weaknesses in earlier research. Thirdly, it establishes a base for your studies' goals and research methodology.
Many students see this chapter as a formality, and copy content from previous assignments or web-based sources. This practice usually leads to very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when presenting existing work.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. In the same way simple explanations are too much to be avoided. For an ignou master's degree project, the review of literature should reflect a postgraduate level of understanding.
You'll be expected to read research papers, books journal articles, reports, and sometimes even government publications related to your area of study. The main focus should be on those studies closely related to the research area you are studying.
In the case of example, if your research focuses on the financial performance of banks, then your literature review should focus on prior research on financial ratios, profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For an ignou project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 reliable sources will suffice when they're well-chosen.
Academic journals are a good option and reputable books written by well-known author, RBI papers, official reports and even university research papers. Websites with ambiguous authorship should be avoided.
Always opt for recent studies and ideally, from the last ten years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they are foundational in terms of.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide chapters of a literature analysis into logical sections.
It is possible to organize the chapter using themes, period methods, or variables that are studied. For example, one section may cover studies related the profitability of a business, while another section may concentrate on liquidity, and another regarding operational efficiency.
This structure aids evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content, but actually analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid excessive language and terms. IGNOU favors clarity over complexity.
Every study you review should include the name of the author as well as the year of study, the objective, methodology, and most important results. Don't mention them chronologically. Try to connect one research to another.
When you've discussed one study, it is possible to explain how another author's work supported the results or countered them. This kind of approach can add richness to your ignou project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common error is to write the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. Discussing fundamental concepts like the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management are not needed here unless directly linked with previous research.
Another mistake is to use too many quotes. Your review of literature should be written in Your own voice. A phrasing style shows understanding, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.
Students are also prone to not linking study findings to their own area. Every study you reference must have a clear connection with your goals for the project.
Linking Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the main outcomes of the review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to show what earlier researchers missed or where further study is needed.
After looking over several studies, you will notice that the majority of research focused on large firms while smaller companies were left out. Or that earlier studies used secondary data, whereas primary data was not as extensive.
This gap becomes the justification for your initiative with ignou MCOM. Without it, your project could appear to be repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
In writing a review of literature It is vital to have a correct citation. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but consistency is more important than perfect.
Each research study should be included in the list of references at the end of the project. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.
Don't use footnotes to review literature. A text-based citation is more efficient as it appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often inquire about how long an essay on literature should be. There's no rule of thumb and for an ignou MCOM project, this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.
The length should depend on topics' complexity. A broad topic will require more research. A focussed topic requires less but more in-depth discussions.
Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without analysis will not help improve marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied the bank's performance, and found positive results
Write this in the same way as
An author carried out a study on bank performance using financial ratios. They concluded that profitability increased because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later affirmed by Author B He emphasized the importance of the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank returns.
This type of approach shows understanding and analysis, which is highly valued in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects are rejected or delayed due to copied literature reviews. Even if your reference is to earlier studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.
Make use of plagiarism-checking tools if possible. Rewrite content to make it sound natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is much better than perfect copying.
Final Review Before Submission
Prior to submitting your IGNOU MCOM project report - 1577-1772.com, mcom project, go back through the literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, if your flow follows logically and if the chapter leads naturally to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this section explain why my study is needed. If the answer is yes your study's literature reviews are on the right path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature for an ignou project could be daunting at first particularly for students who are returning to academics after a gap. Once you realize that it is focused on connection and analysis rather than memorization of information, the task becomes easier to manage.
Be sure to read, think and write with your own voice. This is reflected in the final work. It often the difference is between an average essay and a powerful one.