There are many students who enroll in IGNOU MCOM project submission guide (kartatalanta.ru) reviewing studies can be the most challenging section of the work. This is especially the case when working on IGNOU's mcom projects, in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually isn't as clear. Students typically ask if they need to summarize books, edit journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that different perspectives can impact the quality of the entire project.

A review of literature is not meant to display how much information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you comprehend previous work that pertains to the subject you are researching and how your project fits within it. IGNOU examiners are particularly interested in this chapter as it shows your ability to link ideas with research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before beginning any writing, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter is needed in an ignou mcom project. The literature review serves three essential functions.

First, it demonstrates that the topic you chose has been researched before and is of academic importance. In addition, it allows you to discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. In addition, it can provide the foundation for your research objectives and methodology.

Most students view this section as a formality, and take content from other projects or from online sources. This can result in the project being rejected or not getting marks. IGNOU is seeking original and unique writing even when presenting existing work.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. Additionally simple explanations are also not recommended. When a ignou mcom project is being developed the literature review must reflect the postgraduate understanding.

It is expected that you read books, research papers and reports, as well as journals and, sometimes, government publications relevant to your subject. The concentration should be on the studies closely related to your research topic.

For example, if you research focuses on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should examine earlier research in relation to financial ratios efficiency of banks, profitability analyses and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For an ignou project in the range of 15 to 20 solid sources are typically enough provided they are selected with care.

An excellent source of information is academic journals reliable books from well-known authors RBI publications, federal reports and university research papers. Websites that do not have clear authorship requirements should be avoided.

Always go for the most recent research which are typically from the last ten years. More recent studies can be added only if they are fundamental in terms of.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

An organized chapter improves perception and readability. Instead of composing random summaries and essays, you should divide sections of the review in logical sections.

The chapter can be organized depending on the theme, the time period methods, or variables studied. For example, one section might discuss studies on profitability, another may focus on liquidity, and another on operational efficiency.

The structure can aid evaluators in understanding that you're more than just copying content, but rather analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid a heavy use of language or unnecessary language. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.

Each study you present should include the author's name, year of study, objective, methodology, and significant findings. Don't mention them in a formal manner. Do your best to link one study with another.

When you've discussed one study, it is possible to be able to mention that another author's findings backed and/or refuted the findings. This sort of comparative approach will add the depth of your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review in the form of an academic chapter. Explaining basic concepts such as definition of accounting or meaning of management are not needed in this section unless it is directly connected to prior studies.

Another mistake is excessive quoting. Your literature review should be written by you in your own words. The use of paraphrasing indicates understanding, whereas the copying of your review shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link study findings to their own focus. Every research you present should have a clear connection to your objectives for your project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

The most important result of reviewing literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or indicate where additional research is required.

In the course of discussing several studies it is possible to observe that the majority research focused on large firms however small companies were absent. Some studies have used secondary data, but primary data was not enough.

This gap serves as the rationale for your IGNOU mcom project. Without it, your project may appear monotonous.

Use of Citations and Referencing

While writing the review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.

Each study that is discussed should be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Incomplete references raise doubts about authenticity.

Avoid footnotes during a literature review. Citation in text is more effective and is more professional in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students often inquire about how long the reviews of books should be. There's not a standard for length that can be followed, however for an to do an MCOM project the chapter typically spans from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length should depend on topic complexity. For a broad topic, you will need more study, while a narrowly focused subject requires less but more extensive discussions.

A review that is too long and without any analysis doesn't increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A has studied banking performance and found good results

Write like this
In the year A, Author B conducted a research study on the performance of banks using financial ratios and concluded that profitability improved because of better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B in his study, who focused on the role of operating efficiency in boosting bank earnings.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is highly valued in an MCOM project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get denied or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Even if you refer to previous research, the language is yours.

Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. If you are able, modify your content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is much better than perfect copying.

Final Review Before Submission

Before you submit your ignou project, go through the literature review carefully. Make sure that each study is relevant, whether it flows in a logical manner and whether the chapter is logically linked to your research goals.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reasons why my study is required. If the answer is yes, you're on the correct path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review for an ignou mcom project is not easy at first, especially for students returning into academics after a time off. But once you understand that it's all about connection and analysis rather than memorizing information, the task is a lot easier.

Read, consider, and write in your unique voice. This is reflected in your final work and often determines the difference between the average submission and a outstanding one.