Many students taking part in IGNOU it is the reviewing of studies can be the most challenging section of the work. This is particularly true in the case of an ignou MCOM project where academic rigor is expected. However, instruction often isn't clear. Students usually inquire if they should write down their book chapters, revise journal articles, or simply gather quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that differences can affect the overall quality of the project.
Literature reviews are not a report of how much literature you've read. It is written to show how well you understand the works that are currently being done on the topic you're researching and how your project fits within it. IGNOU assessment experts are attuned to this chapter as it shows your ability to link the theory and research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before beginning any writing, it is essential to know why the section exists in an ignou MCOM project. Literature review serves three main goals.
In the first place, it indicates that the area you've selected is one that has been studied in the past as well as having a relevance for academic studies. The second is that it assists you to discern gaps or deficiencies in earlier research. In addition, it can provide the basis for your research objectives as well as your method of study.
Students often view this chapter as a formality, and copy content from their previous assignments or online sources. This is a common practice that results in low marks or project rejection. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing the results of existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU does not require students to write on the scale of an PhD thesis. The same time the use of very basic explanations is also not recommended. For a project involving ignou MCOM the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.
It is expected that you read books, research papers journals, reports, as well as government publications that are related to your topic. The concentrate should be on studies related to your research area.
As an example, if the project is focusing on the financial performance of banks Your literature review should examine earlier research about financial ratios bank performance, profitability analysis and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake made by students is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quality matters more than quantity. For a project in IGNOU Project MCOM (http://carecall.co.kr/) about fifteen to twenty solid sources are typically enough if they are well chosen.
Excellent sources include academic journals, reputed books by known names, RBI publishing, state reports and university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.
Always prefer recent studies, ideally from the last ten years. These older studies may be included in the event that they are fundamental in manner.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized section improves comprehension and makes a good impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split chapters of a literature analysis into sensible sections.
You can structure the chapter using themes, period and methodology or even variables researched. For instance, one section may focus on research studies related to profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and yet another one on operational efficiency.
This structure makes it easier for evaluators to see that you're more than just copying content but analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing should be academic but simple. Avoid excessive language and vocabulary. IGNOU seeks simplicity above all else.
The study you are discussing should include the author name, year of study, research objectives, methods, and major findings. Be careful not to list them in a formal manner. Do your best to link one study with the other.
When you've discussed your findings from one study, be able to mention that another author's findings backed or refuted the findings. This type of analysis adds greater depth to your project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common error is to write the literature review as the textbook chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management do not belong here unless directly linked to earlier studies.
Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written by you in yourself. Writing in a paraphrase shows comprehension, whereas copying demonstrates dependency.
Students often fail to connect publications to their personal research issue. Every study you reference must be in line with the objectives of your project.
Establishing a linkage Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the key outcomes of reviewing the literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU reviewers expect you to explain what the previous researchers missed or the areas where more study is needed.
In a discussion of multiple studies you may observe that most studies centered on large organizations, while small firms were disregarded. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data, but the primary data was not as extensive.
This is why it's the main reason for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your project could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When you write a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, however coherence is more important than perfection.
Every study to be discussed must be included in the reference list at the end of the project. A lack of references may raise doubts as to the study's authenticity.
Avoid footnotes during a literature review. In text citations work better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students frequently ask what the length of the writing review must last. There is no fixed rule and for an ignou MCOM project, the chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.
The length should be determined by the subject's complexity. A more broad subject requires more studies, while a concentrated topic will require less but more in-depth discussions.
Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no an analysis won't help marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A did a thorough study of the bank's performance and got good results
Write as such
Author A conducted a research study on banking performance using financial ratios. It found that profitability improved due to improved asset management. This was later validated by Author B who pointed out the importance of operational efficiency in improving bank earnings.
This is an approach that demonstrates understanding and analysis, which is appreciated in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get refused or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Even if you cite previous studies, the language has to be distinctly yours.
Utilize plagiarism checking software if feasible and revise content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence is better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before submitting your ignou master of commerce research, read through the literature review carefully. Check whether each study is relevant, whether the flow is rational and if the chapters naturally connect to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reasons for my research. If the answer is yes then your study's literature reviews are on the right track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature as part of an ignou master's thesis isn't easy at first especially for those who return to school after a break. Once you realize that it is an analysis and connection, rather than memorization, the project is a lot easier.
Read, consider, and write in your own voice. The result of your efforts will be apparent in your final product and often can be the difference in the average submission and a good one.
