For many students enrolled in IGNOU it is the reviewing of literature becomes the most confusing section of the work. This is especially true for those working on the ignou master's degree project in which academic depth is expected. However, guidance usually feels limited. Students typically ask if they must summarize books, rewrite journal articles, or simply collect quotations. The reality is somewhere between, and knowing this distinction can alter the quality of the entire project.
A literature review is not intended to be a record of how much information you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the current work in relation to your field and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to this chapter because it reflects your ability to connect the research directions with your theory.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you begin writing any article, it is important to understand why this chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. The review of literature serves three primary functions.
First, it demonstrates it is clear that the topic you've chosen has been previously studied and has a scholarly significance. It also helps you discern gaps or deficiencies in prior research. Thirdly, it gives you an overview of your research goals and methods.
Many students approach this chapter as a formality and take content from other assignments or other online sources. This approach usually results in poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU is looking for original writing even when presenting existing work.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU MCOM project synopsis ; My Site, does not expect students to write on the scale of the PhD thesis. However those who write merely to explain their ideas are also not recommended. In the case of an ignou mcom assignment the literature review should reflect postgraduate-level understanding.
You're expected to study books, research papers Journals, reports, or even publications from the government that relate in your research topic. The concentration should be on the studies that directly connect with the area of your study.
For instance, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should concentrate on studies that have been conducted previously related to financial ratios, banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
The most frequent mistake that students make is combining too many irrelevant sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. For an ignou-mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 sturdy sources is usually sufficient should they be selected carefully.
These are good sources for academic journals highly regarded books by well-known authors RBI books, public reports and university level research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.
The best studies are those that are current and ideally, from the last 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if they are fundamental in the sense that they are fundamental in.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized section improves readability and impression. Instead of writing random summaries, break up the literature review into logical sections.
It is possible to organize the chapter by themes, time period research methodology, or other variables which are being studied. For instance, one section might focus on studies that relate to profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity and the third focus on efficiency in operations.
This structure can help evaluators realize the difference between copying content but analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style should be scholarly but straightforward. Avoid overly complicated language and vocabulary. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.
Each study you discuss should be accompanied by the name of the author, the year of study, the goals, methodology, as well as important findings. Don't mention them in a linear manner. Make sure to connect one study with another.
When you've discussed one study, you could discuss how a different author's findings supported and/or refuted the findings. This sort of comparative approach will add the depth of your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting, or the meaning of management are not needed in this article unless they are directly linked to prior studies.
Another error is quoting too much. Your review of literature should be written by you in you own language. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while the copying of your review shows dependency.
Many students do not connect literature with their own research issue. Every study you mention should have a clear link to your objectives for your project.
Links Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the most significant outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners expect you be able to demonstrate what prior researchers missed or indicate where additional research is needed.
After reviewing a number of studies, you'll see that most research focused on large organizations and small businesses were overlooked. Also, earlier studies employed secondary data but primary information were not sufficient.
This gap serves as the rationale for your project ignou mcom. Without it, your project could seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When writing a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, however quality is more important than consistency.
Each study mentioned must be listed in the reference list at the end of the study. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.
Avoid footnotes in literature reviews. In-text citations are more efficient and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often ask how long the writing review must be. There's no set timeframe to follow, but for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter generally spans from fifteen to between two thousand and a thousand words.
The length of the discussion should be based on the level of complexity of the topic. A larger topic demands the most research, whereas a narrowly focused subject requires less but more extensive discussions.
Unnecessarily lengthy reviews with no any analysis doesn't increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing this way,
Author A studied bank performance and came across positive results
Write in this manner
Write as this: Author A conducted a research study on the performance of banks using financial ratios and concluded that profitability improved through better asset management. This finding was later supported by Author B who also emphasized the importance of operational efficiency in improving the bank's returns.
This method is based on an understanding and analysis that is appreciated in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get delayed or rejected due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if your reference is to earlier studies, the language is yours.
Utilize plagiarism checking tools when possible. Then, rewrite the content until it sounds natural. A slightly imperfect sentence can be better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before you submit your ignou mcom project, read the entire literature review. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether the flow is logical and if the chapter is logically linked to your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter make clear the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes your literature review is on the right path.
Closing Thoughts
Reviewing literature to complete an ignou mcom research project is not easy at first Particularly for students returning to academics following a gap. When you understand that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorizing, the job becomes easy.
Make time to read, think and write in your own voice. This is reflected in your final work and can make the difference between two submissions: a standard one and a strong one.