For many students in IGNOU MCOM project topics (http://aiki-evolution.jp/) reviews of literature is often the most difficult element of the project. This is especially the case for students working on an ignou mcom assignment, where academic rigor is expected. However, guidance usually seems to be a little sluggish. Students are often asked if they are required to summarize books or revise journal articles, or simply collect quotes. The truth lies somewhere between, and understanding that different perspectives can impact the quality of the entire project.
Literature reviews are not written to reveal the quantity of information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how much you comprehend existing work related to your area of study and how your project fits in. IGNOU evaluators look closely at this chapter because it reflects your ability to link the theory and research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before you begin writing any article, it is vital to understand the reason this chapter is essential to an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three primary purposes.
In the first place, it indicates that the subject you picked is one that has been studied in the past and has relevance to academic research. Thirdly, it assists you discover gaps or issues in earlier studies. Third, it provides an understanding of research objectives and methodology.
Many students treat this chapter as a formality and copy content from previous assignments or other online sources. The result is usually poor marks or even project rejection. IGNOU does not require original writing when examining existing studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. While doing so it is recommended that students write in a simple way. not permitted. For an ignou MCOM project the literature review should reflect an understanding of postgraduate levels.
You will be required to read research papers, books, journals, reports, and, sometimes, government publications relevant in your research topic. The concentrate should be on studies which are directly related to the research area you are studying.
For instance, if your project is focusing on the financial performance of banks If so, your literature analysis should focus on earlier studies about financial ratios profitability analysis of bank operations, performance in banking and risk assessment.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
A common mistake made by students is selecting too many non-related sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. In the case of an ignou MCOM project roughly fifteen to twenty strong sources are usually enough for a good selection.
Good sources include academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned author, RBI documents, Government reports and university level research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.
Always pick studies from recent years particularly those that have been published in the last 10 years. Other studies from the past may be considered but only if it is foundational in their nature.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well-organized chapter increases readership and impression. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide an overview of literature into logical sections.
The chapter could be structured based on themes, time period method, variables, or methodologies that are studied. For example, one section may cover studies related profitability, while another could focus on liquidity, and a third focused on the efficiency of operations.
This structure helps evaluators understand that you're more than just copying content, but rather analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The writing style should be straightforward but academic. Avoid excessive language and use of jargon. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.
Each study you present should include the author name, year of study, purpose, method, and important findings. But, don't list them in a linear manner. Do your best to link one study with another.
If you're discussing some study, you can highlight how another author's study supported or opposed those findings. This method of comparison adds the depth of your ignou mcom project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
A common mistake is to write the literature review in the form of a textbook chapter. Basic concepts such as how accounting works or the meaning of management should not be included in this section unless it is directly connected to other studies.
Another issue is the overuse of quoting. Your review of literature should be written in individual words. It is a sign of understanding that you are paraphrasing, while copying implies dependence.
Students often fail to connect study findings to their own topics. Every study you mention should be clearly connected to your goals for the project.
Interlinking Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the key outcomes of a review of literature is to identify the gap in research. IGNOU examiners are expecting you to expose what researchers of the past missed or the areas in which further research is needed.
When you look over a range of studies you'll realize that most research focused on large firms and small businesses were left out. The earlier studies also used secondary data, but the primary data was not enough.
The gap in the picture is the reason for your initiative with ignou MCOM. Without it, your project will seem repetitive.
Use of Citations and Referencing
In writing a review of literature the proper citation is crucial. IGNOU generally accepts APA style, but the consistency is more important than perfection.
Each research study should be included in the reference list at the end of the project. The absence of references can raise doubts regarding authenticity.
Avoid footnotes for literature review. In-text citations are more efficient and is cleaner when used in an ignou mcom project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often inquire about how long the length of their review on literature ought to run. There's no definitive rule in the case of an ignou to do an MCOM project the chapter generally runs between fifteen hundred at to two thousand.
The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. The more expansive topic requires additional research while a particular topic will require fewer, but more in-depth discussions.
Writing unnecessarily long reviews without an analysis won't help marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A studied bank performance and came across positive results
Write like this
The author A conducted a research study on banking performance by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved through better asset management. This result was later confirmed by Author B, who emphasized the role played by operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank profits.
This is an approach that demonstrates understanding and analysis, which can be valued in an MCOM project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects get deferred or even rejected due to review of literature that has been copied. Although you may refer to prior studies, the language ought to be uniquely yours.
Make use of plagiarism checking tools whenever you can and then rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed can be better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Prior to submitting your ignou mcom project, reread the review carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, whether you can follow the logic of the review and whether the chapter flows naturally towards your research objectives.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this article explain the reason why my research is important. If yes, you're on the correct path.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature for a ignou mcom project may feel challenging at first particularly for students who are returning back to their academics after a period of. But once you know that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorization, the project is easy to handle.
It is important to take time to read, consider, and write with your own voice. It is reflected clearly on the final piece and often is the difference between the average submission and a strong one.
