For many students in IGNOU reviews of literature can be the most complicated element of the project. This is especially the case in the case of IGNOU's mcom projects, in which academic depth is expected. However, instruction often feels a bit limited. Students frequently ask if they should write down their book chapters, edit journal articles, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing how different approaches can impact the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not written to reveal how much literature you've read. It is written to show how much you comprehend literature that is relevant to the topic you're researching and how your work fits in. IGNOU evaluations look at this chapter because it reflects your ability to link theoretical concepts to research direction.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before writing anything, it is crucial to comprehend why this section is part of an ignou MCOM project. The review of literature serves three primary functions.

First, it shows that the subject you have chosen already has been explored and has academic significance. Second, it aids you identify any gaps or limitations from earlier research. Third, it provides an outline for your research objectives as well as your method of study.

Many students take this chapter as a formality, and take content from other projects or other sources online. This is a common practice that results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU requires original work even in discussions of studies already completed.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU does not expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. At the same time it is recommended that students write in a simple way. as well discouraged. In an ignou project, the review of literature will reflect understanding that is postgraduate.

It is expected that you read books, research papers journals, reports, and sometimes government publications related to your subject. The focus should be on studies which directly relate to your research area.

As an example, if the project focuses on the financial health of banks In your literature review, you should be focused on previous studies concerning financial ratios banking performance, profitability analysis, and risk evaluation.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

One mistake that students often make is selecting a lot of unrelated sources. Quantity is not as important as quality. In the case of an ignou MCOM project roughly fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough if they are well chosen.

An excellent source of information is academic journals as well as reputable books by renowned authors RBI newspapers, report from government agencies, and even university research papers. Websites with no authorship confirmation should be avoided.

Always choose studies that are recent which are typically from the last ten years. The older studies may be included only if they are foundational in manner.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized chapter can improve readership and impression. Instead of composing short summaries that are not organized, divide each literature overview into sensible sections.

You can structure the chapter according to themes, time period and methodology or even variables studied. For instance, one chapter may cover studies related profitability, whereas a different section could focus on liquidity and the third on operational efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding the difference between copying content, but you are analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The writing style should be academic but simple. Avoid a lot of language and jargon. IGNOU places emphasis on clarity over complexity.

Each study you present should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the objective, methodology, and principal findings. It is not necessary to list them in a formal manner. Try to connect one study with the other.

For example, after discussing some study, you can highlight how another author's study supported or challenged those findings. This way of looking at comparisons adds depth to your ignou mcom project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

A common mistake is to write the literature review as it is a textbook chapter. It is important to clarify the basic concepts, such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management is not appropriate in this article unless they are directly linked in previous studies.

Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written in an individual way. This shows your understanding. using copying can show dependency.

Students also forget to link works to their research issue. Every research you present should have a clear link to the goals of your project.

Affiliation Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the main results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to reveal what previous researchers did not know or indicate where additional research is required.

After examining a variety of studies, you'll notice that the majority of research focuses on large enterprises and small businesses were not considered. Additionally, previous studies utilized secondary data but primary information was not enough.

This is a reason for your an ignou project. Without it, your plan could seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When you write a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally follows APA style, however it is more about consistency than perfection.

All studies discussed must be included in the list of references at the end of the study. Without references, there is a chance to doubt the authenticity.

Beware of footnotes when writing a literature review. Citations in text work better and looks more professional in an ignou mcom project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the length of their review on literature ought to run. There's no standard rule and for an ignou assignment in mcom, this chapter typically ranges from fifteen hundred to two thousand words.

The length should depend on the subject's complexity. The more expansive topic requires more research, while a focused topic needs fewer but more extensive discussions.

Inadequately long reviews and no analyses does not increase marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing as this
Author A looked into the bank's performance, and found positive results

Write as such
The author A carried out a study on banking performance by using financial ratios. The study concluded that profitability increased because of better asset management. The findings were later confirmed by Author B He emphasized the role played by the efficiency of operations in enhancing bank returns.

This approach emphasizes an understanding and analysis that is valued in an ignou mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU MCOM project synopsis (akkrafts.com) takes plagiarism very seriously. Many projects get deferred or even rejected due to copied literature reviews. If you do refer to previously published studies, the style needs to reflect your unique style.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible. Rewrite content until it sounds natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is better than copied perfection.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting an ignou mcom task, revisit the review carefully. Find out if the study you are reviewing is relevant, whether the flow is consistent, and whether your chapter will naturally lead to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter help explain why my study is needed. If the answer is yes it's on the right track.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a literature review to complete an ignou mcom research project can be a challenge at first particularly for students returning to academics following a gap. Once you realize that it's more about connecting and analysis than memorizing information, the task becomes doable.

Spend time reading, consider, and write with your own voice. The effort you put into it will show clearly in the final project and often can be the difference in two submissions: a standard one and a impressive one.