Many students taking part in IGNOU reviewing literature can be the most elusive aspect of their project. This is particularly true when working on an ignou-MCOM project work IGNOU, proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu, project where academic depth is expected. However, guidance often feels a bit limited. Students often ask if they need to summarize books, refret journal articles or simply gather quotations. The reality lies somewhere in between, and knowing that a distinction could alter the overall quality of the project.
A review of literature is not a document that demonstrates the quantity of information you've read. It is written to show how well you have grasped the works that are currently being done on the topic you're studying and how your proposal fits within it. IGNOU evaluaters pay close attention to the chapter since it demonstrates your ability to link ideas with research direction.
Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature
Before writing anything, it is crucial to consider the reasons the chapter exists in an ignou mcom project. Literature reviews serve three principal purposes.
In the first place, it indicates that the topic you selected has been extensively studied and has academic significance. Second, it helps you detect gaps or deficiencies in earlier studies. Third, it provides an outline of your research goals and the methodology.
Many students approach this chapter as a formality and copy content from earlier projects or online sources. The result is usually low marks or project rejection. IGNOU requires original work even when discussing previous studies.
What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review
IGNOU doesn't expect students to write at the level of an PhD thesis. However extremely basic explanations are too much to be avoided. If you are working on an ignou-mcom project, the review of literature should reflect postgraduate level understanding.
You are expected to review books, research papers report, journals, and sometimes, government publications related to your topic. The focus should be on studies relevant to the research area you are studying.
As an example, if the project focuses on the financial health of banks So, your literature reviews should be focused on previous studies related to financial ratios, efficiency of banks, profitability analyses, and risk evaluation.
Selecting Relevant Literature Sources
The most frequent mistake that students make is selecting too many non-related sources. The quality of the information is more important than the quantity. When it comes to an ignou mcom project it is recommended that you use between 15 and 20 powerful sources are generally enough should they be selected carefully.
These are good sources for academic journals reliable books from well-known writers, RBI publications, federal reports and even university research papers. Websites that are not clear on authorship should be avoided.
Always go for the most recent research at least from the last 10 years. Older studies can be included but only if it is foundational in study.
Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter
A well organized chapter improves quality of reading and impression. Instead of writing unstructured summaries, split sections of the review in clear sections.
The chapter can be organized by themes, time period methods, or variables investigated. For instance, one chapter might focus on studies that relate to profit, while another could concentrate on liquidity while the other regarding operational efficiency.
This format helps evaluaters understand that you're not copying content, but you are analyzing it.
Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review
The style of writing should be simple but academic. Avoid heavy language and unnecessary terms. IGNOU is a firm believer in simplicity over clarity.
Each study you discuss should be listed with the author's name, the year of study, the purpose, method, and principal findings. It is not necessary to list them in a formal manner. Do your best to link one study to another.
When you've discussed your findings from one study, discuss how a different author's findings supported the results or countered them. This sort of comparative approach will add complexity to your ignou project.
Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes
One frequent error is writing the literature review in the form of it is a textbook chapter. Simply explaining concepts such as the definition of accounting and the meaning of management does not belong in this section unless it is directly connected in previous studies.
Another error is quoting too much. Your literature review should be written in an individual way. Paraphrasing shows understanding, while the copying of your review shows dependency.
Students should also make sure to link books to their own research topic. Every study you mention should be clearly linked to your research goals.
Connecting Literature Review with Research Gap
One of the most significant results of the review of literature is to identify the research gap. IGNOU reviewers expect you to clarify what research earlier researchers did not or if further research is required.
In the course of discussing several studies you'll notice that the majority of studies focus on large organisations in contrast to small businesses being ignored. The earlier studies also used secondary data, however primary data were not sufficient.
This gap becomes the justification for your projects ignou.com. Without it, the project might appear monotonous.
Use of Citations and Referencing
When you write a review of literature An accurate citation is imperative. IGNOU generally supports APA style, but coherence is more important than perfection.
Each study mentioned must be listed in the list of references at the conclusion of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.
Do not use footnotes for literature reviews. A citation in text works better and is cleaner when used in an ignou MCOM project.
Length of Review of Literature Chapter
Students often ask how long the length of their review on literature ought to run. There is no fixed rule that can be followed, however for an MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred -two thousand words.
The length should depend on what the topic's difficulty. A bigger topic will require more research. A concentrated topic will require less but more in-depth discussions.
A review that is too long and without analyses does not increase marks.
Example of Literature Review Writing Approach
Instead of writing like this
Author A conducted a study of the performance of the banking industry and came to positive results
Write this way
In the year A, Author B carried out a study on the performance of banks by using financial ratios. The study found that profitability improved because of improved asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B, who emphasized the role played by operational efficiency when it comes to improving bank profitability.
This approach emphasizes the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is a must in an mcom project.
Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity
IGNOU is a firm believer in plagiarism. Many projects are refused or delayed because of duplicated literature reviews. Even if you reference prior studies, the language you use must reflect the original.
Use plagiarism checking tools if possible. Then, rewrite the content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed is far better than perfect copied.
Final Review Before Submission
Before you submit your ignou assignment, you should read the review of literature carefully. Verify that each research is relevant, whether the flow is logical, and whether the chapter naturally leads to your research goals.
Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter give a rationale for what my study needs to be done. If the answer is yes, that literature study is in the right track.
Closing Thoughts
Writing a review of literature to complete an ignou mcom research project may initially be challenging particularly for those returning to school after a break. However, once you realize that it is about analysis and connection rather than memorizing information, the task is easy to handle.
You should take the time to read, think and write in your own voice. This is reflected in your final product and often can be the difference in the average submission and a high-quality one.